Debates
http://www.csae.ox.ac.uk/conferences/2011-EdiA/video.html
Against (Opponents) | For (Proponents) | Remarks |
Weak Impact Evaluation (1.1) Lacks clear consistent and limited set of objectives: too many indicators and objectives (1.2) Lacks serious consideration of counter-factual - what would have happened in the absence of the project = no change) - {Ex: mobile phone utilization went in the same direction in other areas} (1.3) Lacks external validity - sites were chosen that were already doing well and might not be able to apply that in more difficult areas - to get external validity, a clear, reproducible means of selecting treatment sites and comparison sites need to be developed |
Counter-argument - Opponents are thinking more in economical sense using marginal effects question of a dollar - How do you apply known interventions, and apply them together, is it possible to achieve the goals by using the money that the world promised? (1.1) Counter to narrow goals - the world agreed to those goals and our challenge is to how to figure out a way to achieve those goals:: a) Adequacy b) Probability (RCTs) - the world made promises but there was no set strategy on how to achieve them (1.2) Why we can't do RCTs? -- there is already evidence for intervention (not a first order question) -- modalities is not ex-ante and cannot be put into RCT -- every village has a different agro-economical zones -- year 2015 deadline -- It's tackling an IMPLEMENTATION CHALLENGE! - How do different sites do in different scenarios? - Have comparison villages?
|
|
Integrated development model design: - WB's Integrated Rural Development Project was tried and failed - WB started and rejected (70s and 80s) - based on the evidence, said it was an unsuccessful approach - MVP is similar to IRD - provides a more justification for the need for impact evaluation |
It is a design problem, where we are looking at an integrated approach not just collection of interventions The WB also rejected other things that are now seen as good: - rejected subsidies - rejected agriculture - rejected public health - so saying WB rejected IRD shouldn't be taken as a evidence that WB didn't see success |
|
Not Sustainable - |
- Designing end-points; how to reach the most end-goals, most poor areas - Villages are on track to reach the goals - They were very difficult to start |
|