| 
  • If you are citizen of an European Union member nation, you may not use this service unless you are at least 16 years old.

  • Stop wasting time looking for files and revisions! Dokkio, a new product from the PBworks team, integrates and organizes your Drive, Dropbox, Box, Slack and Gmail files. Sign up for free.

View
 

The Millennium Village Project

Page history last edited by editor 8 years ago

 

 

Debates

http://www.csae.ox.ac.uk/conferences/2011-EdiA/video.html

 

Against (Opponents) For (Proponents) Remarks 

Weak Impact Evaluation

(1.1) Lacks clear consistent and limited set of objectives: too many indicators and objectives

(1.2) Lacks serious consideration of counter-factual

- what would have happened in the absence of the project = no change)

- {Ex: mobile phone utilization went in the same direction in other areas}

(1.3) Lacks external validity

- sites were chosen that were already doing well and might not be able to apply that in more difficult areas

- to get external validity, a clear, reproducible means of selecting treatment sites and comparison sites need to be developed

Counter-argument

- Opponents are thinking more in economical sense using marginal effects question of a dollar

- How do you apply known interventions, and apply them together, is it possible to achieve the goals by using the money that the world promised?

(1.1) Counter to narrow goals - the world agreed to those goals and our challenge is to how to figure out a way to achieve those goals::

a) Adequacy

b) Probability (RCTs)

- the world made promises but there was no set strategy on how to achieve them

(1.2) Why we can't do RCTs?

-- there is already evidence for intervention (not a first order question)

-- modalities is not ex-ante and cannot be put into RCT

-- every village has a different agro-economical zones

-- year 2015 deadline

-- It's tackling an IMPLEMENTATION CHALLENGE!

- How do different sites do in different scenarios?

- Have comparison villages?

 

 

Integrated development model design:

 - WB's Integrated Rural Development Project was tried and failed

- WB started and rejected (70s and 80s)

- based on the evidence, said it was an unsuccessful approach

- MVP is similar to IRD

- provides a more justification for the need for impact evaluation

It is a design problem, where we are looking at an integrated approach not just collection of interventions

The WB also rejected other things that are now seen as good:

- rejected subsidies

- rejected agriculture

- rejected public health

- so saying WB rejected IRD shouldn't be taken as a evidence that WB didn't see success

 

Not Sustainable

- Designing end-points; how to reach the most end-goals, most poor areas

- Villages are on track to reach the goals

- They were very difficult to start

 
     

 

 

 

 

 

Comments (0)

You don't have permission to comment on this page.